0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

On Predicting Softening Effects in Hard Turned Surfaces—Part II: Finite Element Modeling and Verification

[+] Author and Article Information
Jing Shi

Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105jing.shi@ndsu.nodak.edu

C. Richard Liu

School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907liuch@ecn.purdue.edu

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 127(3), 484-491 (Dec 20, 2004) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1948402 History: Received August 19, 2003; Revised December 20, 2004

A material softening model based on thermal activation energy has been successfully established through tempering experiments in the first part of this study. To apply the model to predicting material softening in hard turned surfaces, the thermal history of work material is needed. In this part, a three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of machining hardened 52100 steel is constructed, and coupled thermal-stress analysis is performed to obtain the material thermal history. Then the material softening model uses the computed thermal history as input to predict the material hardness profiles along the depth into the machined surfaces. Overall, the prediction precisely catches the trend of hardness change along depth and agrees reasonably well with the hardness measurement. What’s more, the sensitivity of material softening to cutting parameters is investigated both quantitatively and qualitatively. Within the investigation range, it is observed that the increase of tool flank wear and feed rate produces severe material softening and a deeper softened layer, while the increase of cutting speed causes significant softening to the surface material but hardly changes the softened depth.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Deformed mesh for cutting condition B

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Section view of machined grooves

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Thermal histories of three material points P1, P2, and P3 on the machined surface

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Comparison between predicted and measured hardness distributions for cutting conditions (a)–(d)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

The effect of cutting speed on material softening in hard turning

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Initial mesh for cutting condition B

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

The effect of feed rate on material softening in hard turning

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

The effect of flank wear on material softening in hard turning

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Predicted force components with respect to flank wear

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In