0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Microscale Mechanical Behavior of the Subsurface by Finishing Processes

[+] Author and Article Information
Y. B. Guo, A. W. Warren

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 127(2), 333-338 (Apr 25, 2005) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1807853 History: Received December 31, 2003; Revised June 21, 2004; Online April 25, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Tarasov,  L. P., 1946, “Detection Causes and Prevention of Injury in Ground Surfaces,” Trans. ASME, 36, pp. 389–451.
Field, M., and Khales, J. F., 1964, “The Surface Integrity of Machined and Ground High Strength Steels,” Defense Metals Information Center Report, Columbus, OH, pp. 54–77.
Griffiths,  B. J., 1985, “White Layer Formations at Machined Surfaces and Their Relationship to White Layer Formations at Worn Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 107, pp. 165–171.
Malkin, S., 1989, Grinding Technology: Theory and Applications of Machining with Abrasives, Horwood, Chichester, UK.
Töenshoff, H. K., Wobker, H. G., and Brandt, D., 1995, “Hard Turning-Influences on the Workpiece Properties,” Trans. NAMRI/SME XXIII, pp. 215–220.
Field, M., Koster, W. P., Kohls, J. B., Snider, R. E., and Maranchik, J. Jr., 1970, Machining of High Strength Steels with Emphasis on Surface Integrity, AFMDC 70-1, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 18–35.
Moylan,  S. P., Kompella,  S., Chandrasekar,  S., and Farris,  T. N., 2003, “A New Approach for Studying Mechanical Properties of Thin Surface Layers Affected by Manufacturing Processes,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 125, pp. 310–315.
Guo,  Y. B., and Sahni,  J., 2003, “A Comparative Study of Hard Turned and Cylindrically Ground white layers,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 44, pp. 135–145.
Schwach, D., and Guo, Y. B., 2004, “An Experimental Investigation of White Layer on Rolling Contact Fatigue Using Acoustic Emission Technique,” Int. J. Fatigue (in press).
Guo,  Y. B., and Barkey,  M. E., 2004, “Modeling of Rolling Contact Fatigue for Hard Machined Components with Process-Induced Residual Stress,” Int. J. Fatigue, 26, pp. 605–613.
Guo,  Y. B., and Yen,  D. W., 2004, “Hard Turning versus Grinding-The Effect of Process-Induced Residual Stress on Rolling Contact,” Wear, 256, pp. 393–399.
Oliver,  W. C., and Pharr,  G. M., 1992, “An Improved Technique for Determining Hardness and Elastic Modulus Using Load and Displacement Sensing Indentation Experiments,” J. Mater. Res., 7, pp. 1564–1583.
Fischer-Cripps, A.C., 2002, Nanoindentation, Springer, New York.
Melkote, S. N., 2003, “Prediction of Microstructural Changes and Residual Stress in Hard Machining,” Proceedings NSF Design, Service, and Manufac. Grantees and Res. Conf., Birmingham, pp. 1349–1359.
Simes,  T. R., Mellor,  S. G., and Hills,  D. A., 1984, “A Note on the Influence of Residual Stress on Measured Hardness,” J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 19, pp. 135–137.
Li,  H., Ghosh,  A., Yan,  Y. H., and Bradt,  R. C., 1993, “The Frictional Component of the Indentation Size Effect in Low Load Microhardness testing,” J. Mater. Res., 8, pp 1028–1032.
Nix,  W. D., and Gao,  H., 1998, “Indentation Size Effects in crystalline Materials: A Law for Strain Gradient Plasticity,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 46, pp. 411–425.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Subsurface nanoindent matrix of the honed AISI 1070 specimen
Grahic Jump Location
Near-surface nanoindent matrix of the turned AISI 52100 specimen (indents underlined)
Grahic Jump Location
Load vs displacement curves for turned AISI 52100 specimen by the worn tool
Grahic Jump Location
Subsurface nanohardness (Mean-Max.-Min.) of the turned AISI 52100 specimens (* WL: white layer)
Grahic Jump Location
Near-surface nanohardness of the turned AISI 52100 specimens
Grahic Jump Location
Subsurface modulus of the turned AISI 52100 specimens
Grahic Jump Location
Near-surface modulus of the turned AISI 52100 specimens
Grahic Jump Location
Near-surface nanohardness of the turned AISI 52100 specimens (thick WL using the worn tool VB: 0.5 mm)
Grahic Jump Location
Near-surface modulus of hard turned AISI 52100 specimens (thick WL using the worn tool VB: 0.5 mm)
Grahic Jump Location
Subsurface nanohardness of ground and honed AISI 1070 specimens
Grahic Jump Location
Near-surface nanohardness of ground and honed AISI 1070 specimens
Grahic Jump Location
Subsurface modulus of ground and honed AISI 1070 specimens
Grahic Jump Location
Near-surface modulus of ground and honed AISI 1070 specimens
Grahic Jump Location
The influence of size-effect on nanohardness of the ground AISI 1070 specimen
Grahic Jump Location
The influence of size-effect on modulus of the ground AISI 1070 specimen

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In