0
TECHNICAL BRIEFS

A Quantitative Sensitivity Analysis of Cutting Performances in Orthogonal Machining with Restricted Contact and Flat-Faced Tools

[+] Author and Article Information
Ning Fang

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-4130 e-mail: ning.fang@usu.edu URL: http://www.mae.usu.edu/faculty/nfang

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 126(2), 408-411 (Jul 08, 2004) (4 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1643081 History: Received July 01, 2003; Online July 08, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M., 2000, Sensitivity Analysis, John Wiley & Sons Limited, Chichester, England.
Leshock,  C. E., Kim,  J. N., and Shin,  Y. C., 2001, “Plasma Enhanced Machining of Inconel 718: Modeling of Workpiece Temperature with Plasma Heating and Experimental Results,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 41, pp. 877–897.
Chan,  C. L., and Chandra,  A., 1991, “BEM Approach to Thermal Aspects of Machining Processes and Their Design Sensitivities,” Appl. Math. Model., 15, pp. 562–575.
Fang,  N., Jawahir,  I. S., and Oxley,  P. L. B., 2001, “A Universal Slip-Line Model with Non-Unique Solutions for Machining with Curled Chip Formation and a Restricted Contact Tool,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 43, pp. 557–580.
Dewhurst,  P., and Collins,  I. F., 1973, “A Matrix Technique Constructing Slip-Line Field Solutions to a Class of Plane Strain Plasticity Problems,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 7, pp. 357–378.
Fang,  N., and Jawahir,  I. S., 2002, “Analytical Predictions and Experimental Validation of Cutting Forces, Chip Thickness, and Chip Back-Flow Angle in Restricted Contact Machining Using the Universal Slip-Line Model,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 42, pp. 681–694.
Dewhurst,  P., 1978, “On the Non-Uniqueness of the Machining Process,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 360, pp. 587–610.
Friedman,  J. H., 1991, “Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines,” Ann. Stat., 19, pp. 1–67.
http://www.salford-systems.com.
Jawahir, I. S., 1986, “An Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Effects of Tool Restricted Contact on Chip Breaking,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of New South Wales, Australia.
Chiffre,  L. De, 1982, “Cutting Tools with Restricted Contact,” Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., 22, pp. 321–331.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Sensitivity analysis of cutting forces
Grahic Jump Location
Sensitivity analysis of chip back-flow angle, tool-chip contact length, chip upcurl radius, and chip thickness

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In