0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Tribological Issues in the Tube Hydroforming Process—Selection of a Lubricant for Robust Process Conditions for an Automotive Structural Frame Part

[+] Author and Article Information
Muammer Koç

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 125(3), 484-492 (Jul 23, 2003) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1580526 History: Received November 01, 2001; Online July 23, 2003; Revised December 01, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Koç,  M., and Altan,  T., 2001, “An Overall Review of the Tube Hydroforming (THF) Technology,” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 108(3), pp. 384–393.
Dohmann,  F., and Bieling,  P., 1991, “Theoretical Basis and Applications of High Pressure Forming,” Bleche Rohre Profile, 38 (5), pp. 379–385.
Dohmann,  F., and Hartl,  C., 1994, “Liquid Bulge Forming as a Flexible Production Method,” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 45, pp. 377–382.
Dohmann,  F., and Hartl,  C., 1998, “Hydroforming Components for Automotive Applications,” Fabricator, February, 30–38.
Wilson,  W. R. D., 1997, “Tribology in Cold Metal Forming,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 119, pp. 695–698.
Schey, J. A., 1983, Tribology in Metalworking, Friction, Lubricant and Wear, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio.
Le,  H. R., and Sutcliffe,  M. P. F., 2002, “Measurements of Friction in Strip Drawing Under Thin Film Lubrication,” Tribol. Int., 35, pp. 123–128.
Prier, M., and Schmoeckel, D., 1999, “Tribology of Internal High Pressure Forming,” Proc. of Int’l Conf. on Hydroforming, Stuttgart, Germany, October 12–13.
Meyer,  W., and Dohmann,  F., 1997, “Tribology in Internal High Pressure Forming” (in German), Blech Rohre Profile, 36–39, October.
Kraan,  D. J., 1981, “Metal Forming Oils,” Tribol. Int., 14, February, pp. 29.
Limb, M. E., Chakrabarty, J., Garber, S., and Mellor, P. B., 1973, “The Forming of Axisymmetric and Asymmetric Components from Tube,” Proceedings of the 14th Int’l. M.T.D.R. Conference, pp. 799–805.
Limb,  M. E., Chakrabarty,  J., Garber,  S., and Roberts,  W. T., 1976, “Hydraulic Forming of Tubes,” Sheet Metal Industries, November, pp. 418–424.
Ahmed,  M., and Hashimi,  M. S. J., 1997, “Comparison of Free and Restrained Bulge Forming by FEM Simulation,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 63, pp. 651–654.
Zu,  Z. M., and Dean,  T. A., 2000, “A Study of Surface Topography, Friction and Lubricants in Metal Forming,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 40, pp. 1637–1649.
Sofuoglu,  H., and Gedikli,  H., 2002, “Determination of Friction Coefficient Encountered in Large Deformation Processes,” Tribol. Int., 35, pp. 27–34.
Harycki,  R. M., Gasper,  K. E., Wagoner,  R. H., 1994, “A New Method for Ranking Sheet Metal Lubricants,” Metal Forming Magazine, November.
Lazzarotto,  L., Dubar,  L., Oudin,  J., 1998, “A Selection Methodology for Lubricating Oils in Cold Metal Forming Processes,” Wear, 215, pp. 1–9.
Klocke,  F., Beck,  T., and Sweeney,  K., 2002, “Examples of FEM Application in Manufacturing Technology,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 120, pp. 450–457.
Singh, H., 1999, “Simulation of Hydroforming Process,” Proc. Of Automotive Tube Conference, Detroit, MI, US, April 26–27.
Koç,  M., and Altan,  T., 2002, “Application of Two-Dimensional (2D) FEA for Expansion of Tubular Parts and Sections via Hydroforming Process,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., March.
Koç,  M., Allen,  T., Jirathearanat,  S., and Altan,  T., 2000, “Use of FEA and Design of Experiments to Establish Design Guidelines for Simple Hydroformed Part,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 40, pp. 2249–2266.
Srinivasan, T. M., Shaw, J., and Thompson, K., 1998, “Tubular Hydroforming: Results,” SAE paper 980448, Intl. Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, February.
Wilson,  W. R. D., Hsu,  T. C., and Huang,  X. B., 1995, “A Realistic Friction Model for Computer Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Process,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 117, May, pp. 202–209.
Hsu,  T. C., and Lee,  C. H., 1997, “Refined Friction Modeling for Simple Upsetting,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 119, pp. 563–570.
Guerin,  J. D., Bartys,  H., Dubais,  A., and Oudin,  J., 1995, “FE Implementation of a Generalized Friction Model: Application to a Upsetting-Sliding Test,” FE in Analysis and Design, 31 , pp. 193–207.
Behren,  A., and Schofetall,  H., 1998, “2D and 3D Simulation of Complex Multistage Forging Process by Use of Adaptive Friction Coefficient,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 80–81, pp. 298–303.
Lee,  B. H., Kim,  Y. T., and Wagoner,  R. H., 2002, “Modeling of the Friction Caused by Lubrication and Surface Roughness in Sheet Metal Forming,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 6244, pp. 1–4.
Steinhoff,  K., Rasp,  W., and Pawelski,  O., 1996, “Development of Deterministic-Stochastic Surface Structures to Improve the Tribological Conditions of Sheet Forming Processes,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 60, pp. 355–361.
Rasp,  W., and Wichern,  C. M., 2002, “Effects of Surface Topography Directionality and Lubrication Condition on Frictional Behavior During Plastic Deformation,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 125–126, pp. 379–386.
Story, J. M., Jarvis, G. W., Murtha, S. J., 1993, “Issues and Trends in Automotive Aluminum Sheet Forming,” SAE Publ #Sp-944, pp. 1–25.
Rao,  K. P., and Wei,  J. J., 2001, “Performance of a New Dry Lubricant in the Forming of Aluminum Alloys Sheets,” Wear, 249, pp. 86–93.
Erdemir, A., and Fenske, G. R., 1998, “Clean and Cost-effective Dry Boundary Lubricants for Aluminum Forming,” SAE Special Publication, NO. SP-1350, pp. 9–17.
G. Dalton, 1999, “The Role of Lubricants in Hydroforming,” Automotive Tube Conference, Detroit, MI, April 26–27.
Morgan,  B., and Brownbeck,  P., 2000, “Lubricant Interaction in Hydroforming of Tubes,” Hydroforming Journal (supplement to Journal of Tube and Pipe), March, pp. 14–16.
Simonetti,  C., 2000, “Why Are You Lubricating On-site,” Fabricating Equipment News, October, pp. 55–57.
Schmoeckel, D., Hielscher, C., Huber, R., and Prier, M., 1997, “Internal High Pressure Forming at PtU” (in German), PtU der Technischen Hochschule Darmstadt.
Ngaile, G., Tibari, K., and Altan, T., 2000, “Progress in Tube Hydroforming-Formability, Friction and Design Guidelines,” Proc. Int’l Conf. on Innovations in THF Tech., Troy, MI, June 13–14.
Vollertsen,  F., and Plancak,  M., 2002, “On Possibilities for the Determinationof the Coefficient of Friction in Hydroforming of Tubes,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 125–126, pp. 412.
Eickemeyer,  J., Vogel,  H. R., Reichert,  J., and Rehm,  M., 1996, “Some Tribological and Environmental Aspects in Metal Drawing,” Tribol. Int., 29(3), pp. 193.
Adhvaryu,  A., and Erhan,  S. Z., 2002, “Epoxidized Soybean Oil as a Potential Source of High-temperature Lubricants,” Ind. Crops and Prod., 15 , pp. 247.
Yoshimura,  H., Torikai,  S., Nishimura,  T., Nonishi,  T., and Inouchi,  N., 2002, “Application of Wheat Flour Lubricants to the Press-forming Process,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 125–126, pp. 375.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Sequence of forming operations in a typical hydroforming process, (b) Some automotive parts candidate forming with hydroforming
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of hydroforming of a simple bulge, and various friction zones in a typical hydroforming process
Grahic Jump Location
Some of the existing friction testing apparatus for hydroforming. (a) University of Darmstadt’s testing tooling for guiding zone friction measurements 836, (b) OSU’s test tooling for guiding zone friction measurements 37, (c) OSU’s test tooling for expansion zone friction measurements 37
Grahic Jump Location
Structural hydroform part used this experiment and overall dimensions
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of minimum thickness measurements in regions B, C, and D for respective lubricants. Tubes with two different initial thickness values (3 and 4 mm) were tested. Lubricant 2 offers the least amount of thinning when all regions and different initial tube thickness conditions are considered.
Grahic Jump Location
(a & b) Comparison of axial force readings for respective lubricants on parts with two different initial tube thickness values. (c) Comparison of punch positions (not real feeding) for parts with initial thickness of 4 mm. Lube 2 performs the best in terms of the smallest force requirements and largest total axial feeding capability.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of (a) overall box dimension (height and width) deviation at all regions. (b) Comparison of flatness at Region B and Region C (c) Comparison of overall radius deviation at all regions. None of these measurements indicates a clear result.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) FE Model, (b, c, d) forming sequence, (e) thinning and (f ) thickness distributions on a typical final part
Grahic Jump Location
Methodology used to predict coefficient of friction based on measurement values and FEA results

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In