A Replacement Model for Multi-Tool Transfer Lines

[+] Author and Article Information
S. B. Billatos

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3139

L. A. Kendall

Department of Mechancial Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931

J. Eng. Ind 112(3), 253-259 (Aug 01, 1990) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2899583 History: Received October 01, 1987; Online April 08, 2008


Transfer lines have long been used for machining a single product at high production rates. This study deals with the transfer line, in particular, estimating the production time per part and the effect of using probability models in describing tool and machine lives. The production time is estimated using three major causes of line stoppage. An aspiration level criterion is used to establish a scheduled tool replacement interval. The aspiration decision parameter is system reliability. It is shown how a scheduled tool replacement interval could be established to obtain this reliability level. A methodology for selecting the replacement interval for a group of tools is developed and the impact of changing this interval on tool changing costs and tool failure costs is discussed. In this study, only a single premature tool failure is assumed to occur; however, the results are compared with multiple tool failures using the renewal function. It is shown that this single premature failure analysis is equivalent to the renewal function approach for machining systems having a reliability greater than 50 percent and tool failure variabilities having a coefficient of variation less than 1.0. Using the model developed in this paper, an example problem is presented. For this problem, electromechanical equipment failure and tool wear failures are modeled using the exponential and the Weibull probability distributions, respectively. Scheduled tool replacement intervals are developed for a range of target reliabilities. The part cycle time and operating cost for the transfer line based on these reliabilities are computed. These results are compared to the minimum cost reliability level. The minimum cost operating condition is dependent on the ratio of the scheduled replacement costs over the failure replacement costs. For the example presented, the reliability level at minimum cost is much lower than the desired target value of .9. This result illustrates the importance of conducting a careful analysis and using the results to help guide operating practices toward more efficient tool change practices and maintenance policies.

Copyright © 1990 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.






Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In