0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Stability of Interrupted Cutting by Temporal Finite Element Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
P. V. Bayly, B. P. Mann

Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130

J. E. Halley

The Boeing Co., St. Louis, Missouri 63166

M. A. Davies

NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 125(2), 220-225 (Apr 15, 2003) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1556860 History: Received March 01, 2001; Revised July 01, 2002; Online April 15, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic diagram of the interrupted cutting process. When the tool is in contact with the work piece, the cutting force is proportional to the cross-sectional area of the uncut chip. The tool vibrates freely when not in contact with the work piece. The coefficients aj1 and aj2 specify the initial position and velocity of the tool as it enters the jth element; the coefficients aj3 and aj4 specify the position and velocity of the tool at the end of the jth element.
Grahic Jump Location
Stability boundaries showing the effect of increasing the fraction of time in the cut (ρ). Parameters: k=2.2×106 N/m,fn=146.8 Hz,ς=0.0038,C=2.0×108 N/m2. Number of elements: E=20ρ. Panel (e) shows a comparison of TFEA lobes with the stability lobes derived by the impulse approximation of Davies et al., 2000 (dotted lines). Panel (f) shows a comparison with stability lobes for continuous cutting derived by the method of Tlusty (1985) (dotted lines).
Grahic Jump Location
Experimental data from continuous sampling (a,c,e,g,i,k) and 1/rev sampling (b,d,f,h,j,l) during milling of 1-DOF flexure. Parameters are as in Fig. 2; fraction of time in the cut ρ=0.1. Row 1 (a,b): 2900 rpm, 2 mm DOC, stable; Row 2 (c,d): 3200 rpm, 2 mm DOC, unstable; Row 3 (e,f ): 3500 rpm, 2 mm DOC, stable; Row 4 (g,h): 3550 rpm, 2 mm DOC, unstable; Row 5 (i,j): 3540 rpm, 2 mm DOC, unstable; Row 6 (k,l): 3540 rpm, 4 mm DOC, stable.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of (a) predicted stability boundaries (lines) with results from simulation (⋅ stable, x unstable); (b) experimental data (⋅ stable, x unstable). Parameters are as in Fig. 2; fraction of time in the cut ρ=0.1. Note that in experimental cutting tests at 3540 rpm a DOC of 5 mm is stable and a DOC of 1 mm, for example, is unstable. Analogous behavior is predicted by analysis and observed in simulation.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In