0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Machinability of Pearlitic Cast Iron With Cubic Boron Nitride (CBN) Cutting Tools

[+] Author and Article Information
Jiancheng Liu, Kazuo Yamazaki

IMS-Mechatronics Laboratory, Dept. of Mechanical & Aeronautical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95616

Hiroyuki Ueda, Norihiko Narutaki, Yasuo Yamane

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Hiroshima University, 4-1, Kagamiyama 1 chome, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739, JAPAN

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 124(4), 820-832 (Oct 23, 2002) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1511522 History: Received February 01, 2002; Online October 23, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Koenigsberger, F., and Tlusty, J., 1970, Structure of Machine Tools, Pergamon Press.
Nakayama,  T., Arai,  M., and Kanda,  T., 1988, “Machining Characteristics of Hard Materials,” CIRP Ann., 37, pp. 89–92.
Mizutani,  M., 1996, “Super High-speed Face Milling By CBN Cutting Tool,” Tool Engineer,No. 5, pp. 49–53.
Wang,  Z. Y., and Rajurkar,  K. P., 1997, “Wear of CBN Tool in Turning of Silicon Nitride with Cryogenic Cooling,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 37, pp. 319–326.
Shanmugan,  S., and Krishnamurthy,  R., 1992, “Machinability Study on Pearlitic Spherical Graphite Cast Iron,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 30, pp. 181–197.
Gastel,  M., Reuter,  U., Schultz,  U., and Ortner,  H. M., 1999, “SIMS Analysis of the Wear of Boron Nitride Tools for the Machining of Compacted Graphite Iron And Gray Cast Iron,” Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 365, pp. 142–146.
Fatahalla,  N., Bahi,  S., and Hussein,  O., 1996, “Metal Metallurgical Parameters, Mechanical Properties and Machinability of Ductile Cast Iron,” J. Mater. Sci., 31, pp. 5765–5772.
Evans,  C. J., and Chou,  Y. K., 1999, “CBN Tool Wear in Interrupted Hard Cutting,” Wear, 225(1), pp. 234–245.
Kamitani, S., 1995, “High-speed Machining Study with the Use of CBN Cutting Tools,” Proceeding of Japan Society for Precision Engineering, C19 , pp. 234–235.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Block diagram of calibration system
Grahic Jump Location
Calibrated EMF data of CBN tools with pearlitic cast iron
Grahic Jump Location
Relationship between tool wear progress and material removal volume for different CBN cutting tools
Grahic Jump Location
Tool wear patterns (material removal volume: 11.2×105 mm3, workpiece: FC300, Vc=500 m/min,f=0.2 mm/tooth,d=0.5 mm, dry cutting)
Grahic Jump Location
Tool wear vs material removal volume for tools CBN4 and CBN6
Grahic Jump Location
Tool wear patterns of CBN4 and CBN6 (material removal volume: 11.2×105 mm3, workpiece: FC300, Vc=2500 m/min,f=0.2 mm/tooth,d=0.5 mm, dry cutting)
Grahic Jump Location
EDX and SEM analysis of side flank face (tool CBN 4, material removal volume: 11.2×105 mm, workpiece: FC300)
Grahic Jump Location
EDX and SEM analysis of side flank face (tool CBN 6, material removal volume: 11.2×105 mm3, workpiece: FC300)
Grahic Jump Location
Tool wear of cutting tool CBN4 at different cutting speeds
Grahic Jump Location
Tool wear versus material removal volume at different feed rates (workpiece: FC300, Tool: CBN4, cutting speed: 2500 m/min, depth of cut: 0.5 mm)
Grahic Jump Location
Tool wear versus material removal volume (workpiece: FC300 and FC300Al)
Grahic Jump Location
SEM analysis of flank face (tool CBN4, f=0.2 mm/tooth,d=0.5 mm, material removal volume: 3×105 mm3, workpiece: FC300, FC300Al)
Grahic Jump Location
EDX and SEM analysis of flank face (workpiece: FC300, tool CBN4, f=0.2 mm/tooth,d=0.5 mm, material removal volume: 3×105 mm3)
Grahic Jump Location
EDX and SEM analysis of flank face (workpiece: FC300Al, tool CBN4, f=0.2 mm/tooth,d=0.5 mm, material removal volume: 3×105 mm3)
Grahic Jump Location
EDX and SEM analysis of flank face (workpiece: FC300Al, tool CBN4, f=0.2 mm/tooth,d=0.5 mm, material removal volume: 3×105 mm3)
Grahic Jump Location
Tool wear versus material removal volume (workpiece FC300H, tools CBN4 and CBN6, Vc=100∼500 m/min,f=0.2 mm/tooth,d=0.3 mm, dry cutting)
Grahic Jump Location
Cutting speed versus cutting force (cutting tool CBN4, d=0.5 mm,f=0.2 mm/tooth, dry cutting)
Grahic Jump Location
Cutting temperature versus cutting speed (f=0.2 mm/tooth, tool CBN4, d=0.5 mm and dry cutting)
Grahic Jump Location
Feed rate versus surface roughness (Ra) for workpiece: FC300 and FC300H (tool CBN4, d=0.5 mm)
Grahic Jump Location
Feed rate versus surface roughness (Rz) for workpiece FC300 and FC300H tool CBN4, d=0.5 mm)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In