Research Papers

Effect of Thread Milling Penetration Strategies on the Dimensional Accuracy

[+] Author and Article Information
Guillaume Fromentin1

 Arts et Metiers Paris Tech, LaBoMaP, Cluny 71250, Franceguillaume.fromentin@ENSAM.EU

Vishal S. Sharma

 Arts et Metiers Paris Tech, LaBoMaP, Cluny 71250, France;sharmavs@nitj.ac.inDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering,  National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar-144011, Indiasharmavs@nitj.ac.in

Gérard Poulachon, Yann Paire

Romain Brendlen

 Arts et Metiers Paris Tech, LaBoMaP, Cluny 71250, Franceromain.brendlen@ENSAM.EU


Corresponding author.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 133(4), 041014 (Aug 16, 2011) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4004318 History: Received November 27, 2009; Revised May 09, 2011; Published August 16, 2011; Online August 16, 2011

Day by day the application of thread milling process is enhancing in industry because of its inherent advantages over other thread cutting techniques. The current study dwells on the interference issue, which is generated during thread milling. It was observed that there are two sources of interference on the thread produced, i.e., interference induced during mill penetration and during full machining. This interference leads to an overcut on the thread; thus, it produces a dimensionally inaccurate thread. The interference produced by penetration is much more when compared to interference generated during full machining of thread. Thus, there is a pressing need to analyze interference during penetration. So, this study evaluates different applied penetration strategies and the level of interference produced. Further, the study suggests modified penetration strategies in order to reduce the interference produced and hence create more accurate thread. This investigation is supported by analytical modeling and experimental exploration.

Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Topics: Thread , Errors , Milling
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Radial error (Er ) along lower flank. (a) FM, HRP, MHRP and (b) FM, QRP, MQRP2 .

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Modeled radial error (Er ) generated by Pm3 and Pm4 points at different cross-sections: (a) HRP and (b) QRP

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Modeled radial error (Er ) along lower flank for FM

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Modeled nominal thread surface, mill envelope for FM in S2 cross-section (case A)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Comparison of measured and computed radial error (Er ): (a) HRP and (b) QRP

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Developed mill center trajectory and its inclination angle (ψ) (Case E): (a) HRP and (b) QRP

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Measured profiles and measurement of radial error in θs cross-section

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Z-axis component (MC3 ) of mill center trajectory (case B). (a). HRP and (b) QRP.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Modeled generated thread profile for FM in S1 cross-section (case A)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Flow chart of the model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Thread milling parameterization for different strategies (case F)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Steps in thread milling cycle for HRP (right hand thread, down milling)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In